Best Practices for Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia
© 2025 HMP Global. All Rights Reserved.
Any views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and/or participants and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy, or position of EP Lab Digest or HMP Global, their employees, and affiliates.
EP LAB DIGEST. 2025;25(5):8-11.
Carmel Ashur, MD; Wendy Tzou, MD, FACC, FHRS; and Lohit Garg, MD, FACC
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Catheter ablation has become a key component in managing recurrent VT, offering arrhythmia control and reduction in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks.1-7 However, the complexity and heterogeneity of VT substrates present challenges in achieving durable outcomes with high rates of recurrence, especially for nonischemic cardiomyopathy. This paper reviews the best practices for VT ablation, integrating advancements in mapping technologies, ablation strategies, and periprocedural management to optimize patient care.

Adapted from Muser D, Castro SA, Liang JJ, Santangeli P. Identifying risk and management of acute haemodynamic decompensation during catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018;7(4):282-287. doi:10.15420/aer.2018.36.3.8
Preprocedural Planning
Risk Assessment and Multidisciplinary Team Involvement
Patients undergoing VT ablation often have underlying structural heart disease and are at an elevated risk for hemodynamic decompensation. The PAINESD score can be used to identify patients at risk of acute hemodynamic compromise and high 30-day mortality (Figure 1).8 For intermediate (score 9-14) to high-risk (≥15) patients, early involvement of a multidisciplinary team is essential, including specialists in heart failure, cardiothoracic surgery, and anesthesia. Complex procedures are best performed in high-volume centers by experienced operators.
Preprocedural Studies and Imaging
A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) of clinical VT when available can help guide procedural planning, along with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to identify structural abnormalities. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is particularly useful for defining areas of potential arrhythmogenic substrate.9,10 In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), CMR can reveal mid-myocardial and epicardial scar and can help anticipate need for epicardial mapping.11
Preprocedural Medication Management
If feasible, antiarrhythmic drugs, except amiodarone, should be discontinued at least 5 half-lives before the procedure to facilitate VT induction and evaluation of clinical endpoints.12 In situations where antiarrhythmic medications cannot be safely held, patients can be admitted prior to ablation for washout of oral medications with initiation of short-acting intravenous (IV) antiarrhythmics such as lidocaine. Warfarin is typically discontinued to achieve an INR <1.5, while direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are typically held for 24 to 48 hours, or 72 hours if epicardial access is anticipated.
Intraprocedural Management
Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Support
General anesthesia (GA) is preferred for these often long and complex procedures, specifically if epicardial access is required.13 Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) is favored for patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, where the procedure is expected to be shorter and the mechanism (automaticity or triggered activity) is catecholamine sensitive.14
When needed, dobutamine is the preferred inotropic agent, particularly in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. When vasopressors are indicated, combined vasopressor/inotropes (epinephrine, norepinephrine) are preferred over pure vasoconstrictors (phenylephrine, vasopressin). In patients with a very low ejection fraction or high PAINESD score, continuous monitoring with arterial line and right heart catheterization may help with inotrope and vasopressor titration, as well as to assess need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Regularly scheduled assessment of fluid balance is critical, with a low threshold for administration of loop diuretics to avoid postprocedural decompensation.
Vascular and Epicardial Access
Ultrasound-guided vascular access is the preferred vascular access strategy.15 Epicardial access is typically obtained via a percutaneous subxiphoid approach under fluoroscopy guidance, with injection of contrast and/or use of a guidewire to demonstrate access in the pericardial space before placement of epicardial sheath.16
In patients with prior cardiac surgery, history of pericarditis, or prior epicardial ablation, adhesions may make epicardial access and maneuverability of catheters difficult. Pericardial CO2 insufflation17 via intentional coronary vein perforation can facilitate safer epicardial access18 and allow for better visualization of adhesions.19 Alternatively, surgical access with a subxiphoid window or limited lateral thoracotomy can be used.20
Anticoagulation Use
Epicardial access should be obtained prior to starting systemic anticoagulation or after anticoagulation has been adequately reversed.21 Intraprocedural IV heparin with a target ACT of >300 should be used during endocardial LV mapping and ablation,22 and may be considered with right ventricular (RV) mapping/ablation in patients at high risk for thromboembolism.12
VT Mapping and Ablation Workflow (Figure 2)

Electrophysiologic Testing
Next, programmed electrical stimulation (PES) is performed either by pacing from a catheter in the RV or via noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) in patients with an ICD. This helps provide confirmation of clinical VT, creation of a morphology template to match VTs during the case, and definition of a clinical endpoint (ie, noninducibility). While other workflows exist, our practice is to perform VT induction prior to mapping in order to avoid potentially altering the clinical VT morphology or rendering a patient noninducible.23 When a 12-lead ECG of the clinical VT is not available, it can record intracardiac electrograms from the patient’s device during VT induction and match with stored VT episodes.24 PES can be avoided if there is concern that VT will not be hemodynamically tolerated or is felt to be unsafe, such as in the setting of severe LV dysfunction.
Baseline Substrate Mapping
Following PES, high-density voltage and functional mapping is performed in normal sinus rhythm, RV pacing, and/or LV pacing.25 Mapping is ideally performed with a linear multielectrode mapping catheter (eg, Optrell Mapping Catheter, Johnson & Johnson MedTech; Advisor HD Grid Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled, Abbott). Multispline catheters should be avoided, as they can cause significant ectopy and make mapping more challenging.26 While point-by-point mapping can be performed with a bipolar catheter if needed, mapping with a high-density catheter is preferred when applying newer functional-based techniques.
Baseline voltage mapping is performed to identify border zone regions (voltage 0.5-1.5 mV).27 Annotation of local abnormal ventricular activity (LAVA) and fractionated signals can help define areas that are often components required for a VT circuit.28 When near-field signals are hidden within larger far-field signals, decrement evoked potential (DEEP) mapping can be used to unmask poorly coupled substrate that may be a viable target for ablation.29
Functional and activation mapping should be performed to identify areas of slow conduction/deceleration zones (DZs). This is performed via isochronal late activation mapping (ILAM), where ventricular signals are timed to the offset of the latest component of the bipolar electrogram and then ventricular activation is divided into 8 equally distributed time intervals, or isochrones.30 DZs are defined as regions where 3 isochrones are present within a 1-cm radius.30 These DZs are often critical components required to sustain VT (Figure 3, Video 1).

VT Mapping
Once baseline substrate and functional mapping are complete, attempts at VT induction are repeated. Pre-treatment with atropine can help reduce the associated vagal response with VT and allow a longer duration for mapping and entrainment.31 Strategic multielectrode positioning (StaMP) in different high-yield locations identified through ILAM mapping can help capture maximal spatial information over a short time period.32 There is limited evidence to support the use of MCS for the purposes of mapping poorly tolerated VT.33
For re-entrant VT, diastolic potentials may represent critical components of the circuit. Fractionated electrograms immediately preceding surface QRS onset typical signify an exit site, where ablation could terminate VT or cause shifting to a new exit site. Mid-diastolic potentials are preferred ablation targets, as they more likely represent critical isthmus sites. VT circuits often exist in a 3-dimentional model, where gaps in activation sequence may reflect an intramural component not recorded by an electrode on the endocardial surface.34
When VT is hemodynamically tolerated, activation mapping is prioritized to better visualize the VT circuit (Figure 3, Video 2). When possible, entrainment mapping can provide insight into the different components within the VT circuit.35 Important pitfalls to consider include decremental conduction with faster pacing, far-field capture with higher pacing outputs, inaccurate measurement of far-field signals as near-field, easy termination/modification of VT with pacing and prolonged post-pacing interval with AAD use,36 or after partial ablation due to conduction slowing. For these reasons, entrainment mapping should be considered as one component to an overarching ablation strategy, typically combined with a form of substrate modification.
Finally, pace mapping can help localize the exit site for VT, without the need for VT induction. This is done with bipolar pacing close to the VT cycle length, with an output just above threshold and small/closely spaced electrodes in order to simulate clinical VT and avoid far-field capture.37 It is important to consider that a good pace match can occur in noncritical sites adjacent to an exit and poor pace match can occur in critical sites near an entrance that propagate retrograde from the VT circuit.
Target Endpoint
The procedural endpoint is largely based on the specific ablation strategy chosen. The most clinically relevant endpoint is VT noninducibility, which has been associated with lower VT recurrence;1,38 however, is difficult to interpret in the setting of baseline noninducibility. Similarly, VT noninducibility under GA can be falsely reassuring; therefore, performing a NIPS under MAC 48 to 72 hours following ablation may be more clinically meaningful.39
Noninducibility is typically combined with one of the following substrate-specified end points:40
• Elimination of DZs: loss of areas with isochronal crowding on repeat ILAM41 or complete elimination of late potentials/LAVAs.42,43
• Elimination of excitability: transection of likely critical isthmus sites, as defined by entrainment or pace mapping.44
• Substrate homogenization: loss of pace capture within a broadly defined region of potentially arrhythmic tissue (low voltage, isolated components/late potentials, conduction channels, etc.).5
• Core isolation: entrance and exit block within region containing dense scar (<0.5 mV) and critical VT circuit elements.45
Regardless of whether the desired clinical end point was met, it is important to consider the progressive increase in hospital mortality associated with longer procedure duration, with an inflection in risk after around 6 hours. This risk is enhanced if MCS is needed during the case.46
Postprocedural Management
If heparin was used, protamine is administered prior to sheath removal to shorten time to hemostasis and ambulation.47 Treatment with reduced or full-dose DOAC should be given following LV ablation, initiated within 48 hours of the procedure, and continued for at least 30 days to reduce stroke risk.48
If epicardial access was obtained, a pericardial drain is typically left in place, especially if bleeding or tamponade occurred. The drain can be removed once there is <50 cc of output over 24 hours and no effusion reaccumulation on TTE following a clamping trial. Prophylactic intrapericardial steroids are given during the procedure to reduce the incidence of postprocedural pericarditis.49
Most patients require overnight monitoring post ablation. Patients with severe ventricular dysfunction, ongoing hemodynamic compromise requiring vasopressor support, retained pericardial drain, or a procedural complication should be admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit for ongoing management.
Disclosure: The authors have completed and returned the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest, and report no conflicts of interest regarding the content herein.
References
1. Reddy VY, Reynolds MR, Neuzil P, et al. Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(26):2657-2665. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa065457
2. Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, et al. Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs. N Engl J Med. 375(2):111-121. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1513614
3. Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, et al. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9708):31-40. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61755-4
4. Kuck KH, Tilz RR, Deneke T, et al. Impact of substrate modification by catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with unstable ventricular arrhythmias and coronary artery disease: results from the multicenter randomized controlled SMS (Substrate Modification Study). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(3):e004422. doi:10.1161/circep.116.004422
5. Arenal Á, Ávila P, Jiménez-Candil J, et al. Substrate ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(15):1441-1453. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.050
6. Tung R, Xue Y, Chen M, et al. First-line catheter ablation of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in cardiomyopathy concurrent with defibrillator implantation: the PAUSE-SCD randomized trial. Circulation. 2022;145(25):1839-1849. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.122.060039
7. Della Bella P, Baratto F, Vergara P, et al. Does timing of ventricular tachycardia ablation affect prognosis in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator? Results from the multicenter randomized PARTITA trial. Circulation. 2022;145(25):1829-1838. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059598
8. Muser D, Castro SA, Liang JJ, Santangeli P. Identifying risk and management of acute haemodynamic decompensation during catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018;7(4):282-287. doi:10.15420/aer.2018.36.3
9. Bogun FM, Desjardins B, Good E, et al. Delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: utility for identifying the ventricular arrhythmia substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(13):1138-1145. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.052
10. Andreu D, Ortiz-Pérez JT, Boussy T, et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying the ventricular arrhythmia substrate and the approach needed for ablation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(20):1316-1326. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht510
11. Soto-Iglesias D, Acosta J, Penela D, et al. Image-based criteria to identify the presence of epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with transmural myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(6):814-821. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.02.007
12. Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(1):e2-e154. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.002
13. Nof E, Reichlin T, Enriquez AD, et al. Impact of general anesthesia on initiation and stability of VT during catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(11):2213-2220. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.018
14. Ward RC, van Zyl M, DeSimone CV. Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):930. doi:10.3390/jcm12030930
15. Sharma PS, Padala SK, Gunda S, Koneru JN, Ellenbogen KA. Vascular complications during catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: a comparison between vascular ultrasound guided access and conventional vascular access. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(10):1160-1166. doi:10.1111/jce.13042
16. Sosa E, Scanavacca M, D’Avila A, Pilleggi E. A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7(6):531-536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00559.x
17. Juliá J, Bokhari F, Uuetoa H, et al. A new era in epicardial access for the ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(1):85-96. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.027
18. Foo FS, Sy RW, D’Ambrosio P, et al. Novel epicardial access technique facilitated by carbon dioxide insufflation of the pericardium for ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: lessons from the early experience from a single centre in Australia. Heart Lung Circ. 2023;32(2):197-204. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2022.09.002
19. Chaumont C, Oraii A, Markman TM, et al. Epicardial carbon dioxide insufflation is a novel technique for the identification of epicardial adhesions and targeting epicardial access. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21(7):1040-1041. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.034
20. Michowitz Y, Mathuria N, Tung R, et al. Hybrid procedures for epicardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: value of surgical access. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(11):1635-1643. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.07.009
21. Aliot EM, Stevenson WG, Almendral-Garrote JM, et al. EHRA/HRS expert consensus on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(6):886-933. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.030
22. Siontis KC. Intra-procedural anticoagulation protocols for left-sided cardiac ablations: striking a balance between risk and benefit. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2016;16(6):179-180. doi:10.1016/j.ipej.2016.12.005
23. Aboud AA, Davogustto G, Adeola O, et al. Substrate mapping alters ventricular tachycardia inducibility. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023;16(2):e010889. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.122.010889
24. Yoshida K, Liu T-Y, Scott C, et al. The value of defibrillator electrograms for recognition of clinical ventricular tachycardias and for pace mapping of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(12):969-979. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.043
25. Tung R, Josephson ME, Bradfield JS, Shivkumar K. Directional influences of ventricular activation on myocardial scar characterization. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(8):e004155. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004155
26. Tschabrunn CM, Roujol S, Dorman NC, Nezafat R, Josephson ME, Anter E. High-resolution mapping of ventricular scar. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(6):e003841. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003841
27. Soejima K, Stevenson WG, Maisel WH, Sapp JL, Epstein LM. Electrically unexcitable scar mapping based on pacing threshold for identification of the reentry circuit isthmus: feasibility for guiding ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circulation. 2002;106(13):1678-1683. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000030187.39852.a7
28. Sacher F, Lim HS, Derval N, et al. Substrate mapping and ablation for ventricular tachycardia: the LAVA approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):464-471. doi:10.1111/jce.12565
29. Porta-Sánchez A, Jackson N, Lukac P, et al. Multicenter study of ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation with decrement-evoked potential (DEEP) mapping with extra stimulus. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(3):307-315. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2017.12.005
30. Irie T, Yu R, Bradfield JS, et al. Relationship between sinus rhythm late activation zones and critical sites for scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(2):390-399. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002637
31. Pujol-Lopez M, Du Fay de Lavallaz J, Rangan P, et al. Vasovagal responses to human monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: hemodynamic implications from sinus rate analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(11):1096-1105. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.06.033
32. Cabrera Borrego E, Sancez Millan P, Constan De La Revilla E, Tercedor Sanchez L, Alvarez Lopez M. Omnipolar technology in ventricular tachycardia ablation: activation and substrate mapping with late activation isochrone analysis under extrastimulus protocol. EP Europace. 2023;25(Suppl 1):euad122.311. doi:10.1093/europace/euad122.311
33. Turagam MK, Vuddanda V, Atkins D, et al. Hemodynamic support in ventricular tachycardia ablation: an international VT ablation center collaborative group study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(13):1534-1543. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.005
34. Tung R, Raiman M, Liao H, et al. Simultaneous endocardial and epicardial delineation of 3D reentrant ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(8):884-897. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.044
35. Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Sager PT, et al. Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1180-1189. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00065-X
36. Fontaine G, Frank R, Tonet J, Grosgogeat Y. Identification of a zone of slow conduction appropriate for VT ablation: theoretical and practical considerations. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989;12(1):262-267. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb02656.x
37. Goyal R, Harvey M, Daoud EG, et al. Effect of coupling interval and pacing cycle length on morphology of paced ventricular complexes. Implications for pace mapping. Circulation. 1996;94(11):2843-2849. doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.11.2843
38. Ghanbari H, Baser K, Yokokawa M, et al. Noninducibility in postinfarction ventricular tachycardia as an end point for ventricular tachycardia ablation and its effects on outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(4):677-683. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001404
39. Frankel DS, Mountantonakis SE, Zado ES, et al. Noninvasive programmed ventricular stimulation early after ventricular tachycardia ablation to predict risk of late recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(17):1529-1535. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.026
40. Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Lakkireddy D, et al. Ablation of stable VTs versus substrate ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy: the VISTA randomized multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(25):2872-2882. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.026
41. Aziz Z, Shatz D, Raiman M, et al. Targeted ablation of ventricular tachycardia guided by wavefront discontinuities during sinus rhythm. Circulation. 2019;140(17):1383-1397. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042423
42. Di Marco A, Oloriz Sanjuan T, Paglino G, et al. Late potentials abolition reduces ventricular tachycardia recurrence after ablation especially in higher-risk patients with a chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related artery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(8):1119-1124. doi:10.1111/jce.13488
43. Jaïs P, Maury P, Khairy P, et al. Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2012;125(18):2184-2196. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.043216
44. Soejima K, Stevenson WG, Maisel WH, Sapp JL, Epstein LM. Electrically unexcitable scar mapping based on pacing threshold for identification of the reentry circuit isthmus. Circulation. 2002;106(13):1678-1683. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000030187.39852.A7
45. Tzou WS, Frankel DS, Hegeman T, et al. Core isolation of critical arrhythmia elements for treatment of multiple scar-based ventricular tachycardias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(2):353-361. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002310
46. Yu R, Ma S, Tung R, et al. Catheter ablation of scar-based ventricular tachycardia: relationship of procedure duration to outcomes and hospital mortality. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(1):86-94. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.004
47. Ghannam M, Chugh A, Dillon P, et al. Protamine to expedite vascular hemostasis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(11):1642-1647. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.06.045
48. Lakkireddy D, Shenthar J, Garg J, et al. Safety/efficacy of DOAC versus aspirin for reduction of risk of cerebrovascular events following VT ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(12):1493-1501. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2021.07.010
49. Dyrda K, Piers SR, van Huls van Taxis CF, Schalij MJ, Zeppenfeld K. Influence of steroid therapy on the incidence of pericarditis and atrial fibrillation after percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation for ventricular tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(4):671-676. doi:10.1161/circep.113.001148